Keepin' It Reel

Recently a friend and colleague of mine acquired an old reel of analog tape and asked me if I knew how to go about "digitizing" it. This particular spool contained original music recordings from the 1970s by his father. For those of you who don't know, analog tape for several decades had been the top choice for a physical medium on which to capture, play back, and preserve audio. However, with the advent of home recording, ease and affordability won out over this archaic archival process. (Analog tape is the equivalent of film for cameras.) As such, devices on which to hear these tapes are becoming more scarce. My friend's dilemma was rooted in the tension of the inherent value he placed in the content embedded on the reel, excitement to finally hear it (he didn't know exactly what it contained), and the concern that finding a way to transfer it could be a difficult process at best.

As mentioned elsewhere, I was professionally trained in recording world at the dawn of the digital revolution. So, I had the benefit of having a foot in both old-school analog world and the new wave of digital technology. When Matt sent me this photo and asked how he could hear it, a flood of memories and questions immediately occupied our conversation. I had the fun privilege of using and working with analog tape as a recording format: 2", 1/2", 1/4", threading the tape on machines, calibrating the electronics, splicing takes together with a razor blade, etc. My reverence and understanding of this medium allowed me to share the concerns he had for handling the tape. "What size was it? How many tracks across the tape width? Is it a 2-mix or multitrack? How old did you say it was?" As there was no documentation included in the box, we started kicking around ideas about good transfer houses. My next suggestion was that he get the reel "baked." 'What do you mean 'Baked"?' he asked. "I mean exactly as you think! Bake it! As in stick it in the oven at 125 deg. F for several hours." Analog tape is pretty straightforward: metal oxide particles are glued to a mylar backing... Over time, however, the glue gets weak, and if the old tape is played on a machine prior to baking, the metal particles run against the tape head and shed right off the plastic tape backing. Baking the tape melds these components back together and is recommended just prior to transferring the contents to a different medium, and repeated plays on the original tape are not recommended. So, off to the mastering house Matt's reel goes, and it'll be interesting to hear the results.

Back in the studio days, maybe a couple times each year, we dealt with clients who needed to get their tapes baked . One particular instance stuck with me when the artist wanted to do more than just transfer an old reel. In 1999, we were working on the 2nd Willow Creek "Preludes" CD, and producer John Carlson asked us to transfer music from a 2" reel of an old recording by fellow musician/composer Russ Daughtry. The original song, "Jesus," from 1981 contained acoustic guitar and voice. Russ had been a part of the Willow Creek music community, and prior to making this CD he was diagnosed with ALS/Lou Gehrig's disease. John's intention was to honor his friend by including an updated version of the song by transferring the tracks to a newer format and overdubing saxophone and synth to fill it out. Of course, the original tape was old and needed to be baked. Though I could understand the intent, I was more interested in the process than the content. Would the tape hold up? Would the creative recording machine roll forward? This was all before I became a follower of Jesus Christ, so the motive of giving glory to God through music and worship was not really a motivator for me. John & Russ's desire was that their savior would be worshiped despite circumstances. I was fixated on making the client happy. Clearly our Creator can still use pagans in these moments for His purposes without us even knowing it.

More recently, I've come to revere God's Word as the primary instruction for knowing Him and living a life pleasing to Him. Daniel Wallace, Professor of NT Studies at DTS, is also executive director for The Center for the Study of New Testament Manuscripts. This organization is committed to the preservation and translation of ancient bible documents into modern and more user-friendly digital formats. Though the process is fascinating, it's the God of the content who commands the attention of such endeavors. I would encourage you to browse their website to learn about their work.

In 2 Kings 22, we read of King Josiah repairing the temple and Hilkiah the high priest finding God's Book.

v 8-13: "And Hilkiah the high priest said to Shaphan the secretary, “I have found the Book of the Law in the house of the Lord.” And Hilkiah gave the book to Shaphan, and he read it. And Shaphan the secretary came to the king, and reported to the king, “Your servants have emptied out the money that was found in the house and have delivered it into the hand of the workmen who have the oversight of the house of the Lord.” Then Shaphan the secretary told the king, “Hilkiah the priest has given me a book.” And Shaphan read it before the king.
When the king heard the words of the Book of the Law, he tore his clothes. And the king commanded Hilkiah the priest, and Ahikam the son of Shaphan, and Achbor the son of Micaiah, and Shaphan the secretary, and Asaiah the king's servant, saying, “Go, inquire of the Lord for me, and for the people, and for all Judah, concerning the words of this book that has been found. For great is the wrath of the Lord that is kindled against us, because our fathers have not obeyed the words of this book, to do according to all that is written concerning us.”

Oh that we'd be a people who increasingly revere our Creator!
Oh that we'd be a people who are growing in our love for His Word and desire to live by it!

In John 14:21, Jesus says, "Whoever has my commandments and keeps them, he it is who loves me. And he who loves me will be loved by my Father, and I will love him and manifest myself to him.”

E.U. to Impose Volume Sanctions on MP3 Players

Much like a "governor switch" that limits maximum car speed, the European Union is encouraging makers of MP3 players to implement output-volume limits in their devices.

A.P. released the story today...

In One Ear and Out the Other: The Challenges of Using In-Ear Monitors

This past weekend during worship service rehearsal I was confronted with an audio phenomenon that didn't fully compute. The setup was fairly normal: drums, bass, guitars, piano, a few extra line-drums, 3 vocalists. The team was well into the run-through when we were confronted with a short burst of feedback in a narrow band around 3-4kHz. Immediately I looked up from my board and toward the stage to get the visual confirmation (band and vocalists wincing in unison, looking back at us in the booth like we're idiots) that something in the system just ripped through the signal chain inducing said noise-burst directly into the ear canals of all the unlucky recipients. Fortunately we (band and techies) are a team and all collectively bore the brunt of the unruly squeal. Experience immediately told me that a vocal microphone was just pointed into a monitor wedge...Although there was just one little problem: THERE WAS NO STAGE MONITOR WEDGE IN USE!!! It was, however, a little different in that it was not as full in volume as a typical feedback burst would be, so I cataloged it as an anomaly and moved on. A few minutes later it happened again. Mystified, I started scanning through all my FOH gain settings, then moved over to take a look at the gain settings in monitorland. The vocalists were collectively singing louder at that point and a few of the input channels and IEM transmitters were living in the red-zone a bit too much. So I had the monitor board operator dial back a few of the things to leave some headroom for the actual service, but didn't equate any of the changes as being related to the main issue at hand. The feedback problem didn't happen again, but after about another half-hour of mulling it over it dawned on me what might be the source of the problem. There was a particular vocalist for that service who notoriously sings quietly, putting out very little acoustic energy, thus requiring significant reinforcement from the mic and speakers. She also has a very narrow tonal range, which complicates the matter. Still, I new the feedback was not coming from the house PA as I've been able to beat her EQ up regularly enough that it's not a problem for me (note: this after frequently and lovingly encouraging her to "sing out!") and the house doesn't characteristically ring in this range if at all. This lead me back to consider the monitor setup. It dawned on me that just as I needed to turn her up in FOH, so did the monitor guy. Then I realized that the vocalist was committing the unpardonable sin of using only one earpiece of her in-ear monitor setup but with the addition of her draping the unused earpiece on the front of her shirt, hanging a third of the way down her chest...just at the same location she decided to hold her microphone while not singing!!! Who woulda' thunk!?! Feedback issues with IEMs... Her vocal was SO cranked in her mix that when her microphone passed by the open earbud, catching it at just the right angle, it caused the system to spiral into unstable audio territory! Crazy... One for the books for sure.

This obviously got me thinking about the whole in-ear monitor scenario in general. I've had long debates in discussions about all aspects of the issue with band and technicians alike. The musicians and singers at our church are typically mixed in their usage with some using both earpieces and some using only one. The argument for usage of only one earpiece goes something like - "Well, I feel cut off from the audience, band, etc." which is understandable but fixable. The worse scenario is the defeatist mentality of "well, the mix doesn't sound great so I won't be a bother to the sound guy...really, it's fine." That, in my book, is completely unacceptable as an excuse.

I won't be exhaustive here about all the issues and how to fix them. There are a number of informative resources that address the process and challenges already. What I do want to do is pose a charge to both performers and technicians, especially as it relates to serving in the context of the Worship Ministry.

First of all, the sound team exists to serve the musicians and singers, who in turn serve the congregation by leading them in song-worship of the Living God. This all is then laid on top of the charge that we are "serving the Lord Christ." (Col. 3:23-24) As such, we can not with good conscience continue to wallow in a sea of indifference and mediocrity if we are to serve with excellence. There are some very tangible ways to get better at what we do, what we should expect, and how we develop our craft.

For those on the platform (band, singers, musicians) I ask you that you be honest in two areas:
1. Your hearing is important to us and it should be to you. Using only one ear puts you squarely on the fast track to long-term hearing damage. In a recent informative Mix article, Michael Santucci, noted audiologist and founder of Sensaphonics has this to say about using one earpiece vs. two:“When players take one out, their brain loses its ability to do binaural summation, where two ears together add up to a 6dB increase in your perception of loudness,” Santucci explains. “If you're hearing 90 dB in both ears, your brain thinks it's hearing 96 dB. If you take one ear away, then that one ear has to go from 90 to 96 to sound like 96. And now the other ear is open and getting bashed by the band, the P.A. and the crowd. So this loud sound coming into the open ear causes you to turn the other ear up even more. In terms of ear safety, using one earpiece is a dangerous practice — it could actually be worse than using none at all.”
2. You need to begin demanding better mixes from the technicians. Ask for a nice musical mix; something that's well balanced (with you on top of course), but something more inspiring than just plain-old functional, i.e. - "lots of my voice and maybe just a little piano and acoustic guitar." Get the right amount of stereo ambient or crowd mics into the equation to get a sense of spaciousness and you should be good to go.

We love you musicians and desperately want you to use your gifts to lead us for years to come. God has given you talent to steward through your voice or hands, but he's also given you two ears to steward as well. As such, please do not take lightly the potential risks involved in compromising your monitoring situation. Your feelings are no match for the brutal reality found in empirically verifiable data on hearing loss due to poor listening practices.
"He who has ears to hear, let him hear."

Now, on to the technicians (myself included). The charges here are the similar as the ones I give to those on the platform:
1. Soundboard operators are responsible for providing safe listening levels in the house and on stage. We are joint-stewards of the hearing faculties of the people we serve, and so we need to be increasingly concerned about creating and promoting a safe environment for our worship leaders.
2. We need to exhibit an increasing proficiency in our craft. It's a poor excuse to say "Well I'm just a volunteer," or "I'm only on once a month; I don't do this for a living and you can't expect perfection." First of all the Lord Jesus (and hopefully those you serve with) see what you do as more than just being a volunteer. Friend, do you not realize this is an act of worship. We put forth our our time and skill and heart and preparation and prayer as an offering to God knowing that we're part of a larger movement to stir people into praise and change peoples lives. It is service and it does require a great degree of humility. Oh, and it definitely requires much grace, especially from the band as it pertains to expectations. We understand that most people who serve on the tech team don't exercise the same skill vocationally during the week. It would do everyone well to remember that the board operator can't pick up the big soundboard and take it home to practice much like a guitarist or vocalist can take their instrument with them. However, this is not a license to neglect the craft in between times we serve. I'm not saying we need to be perfect; we just need to be seeking ways to excel in our craft.
As it pertains to mixing monitors, there are so many ways to get better. Here are a few ideas:
A) Run sound in a different ministry that meets midweek. Sound is sound; any experience can be brought back to the weekend ministry context.
B) Communicate...A LOT! Don't just sit in the booth during the weekend. Go talk to the people you serve; after or in-between services is always good. We're on a team together, and team mates seek to build comfortable relationships where the craft can be discussed. Ask them what they like or don't like about the mix. If you get a simple answer like "It's fine..." News Flash!!! It's not fine. Be specific about something to start the dialog. Try something like "Hey, I tried to brighten up the piano to help the notes cut through a bit more. Did that help you?" This may prompt a response like "Well, I didn't notice that so much, but what I could use is a little more kick, snare, and hat to feel the rhythm better."
C) For IEMs, start improving the stereo mix. We have two ears to hear, which give us a sense of depth and spaciousness. Nothing short-circuits this sensation faster than listening to a mono mix. Often we use two mix channels for input to each wireless IEM transmitter. This means that the system is capable of a stereo mix to the receiver. I worked for years in a studio creating stereo monitor mixes for artists. It takes lots of practice, but it's worth it for them and you. Our singers and musicians should be asking us for a beautiful and inspiring stereo mix...everytime! When was the last time you listened to your iPod with only one ear in? I thought so...Pan out that drum kit, spread out those piano, synth, and keyboard channels, pan the guitars out a bit. Keep the vocal up the middle and prominent, and for good measure, bleed in some of the crowd mics and/or reverb fx to "wet it up."
D) Be listening to lots of music to get some perspective. If you don't love music, you probably shouldn't be serving in this area. Listen to both high quality reference music and sub-par stuff, too. I'm a firm believer in exposure to good and bad sounding stuff, otherwise you never have a guage on the sound quality of the stuff you're mixing. Additionally, be listening to stuff that the band and singers listen to; and not just the mp3 of the special for the weekend, but invest in a variety of CDs of the styles and artists whose songs we play.
E) Be immersing yourself in the wealth of resources outside of just prerecorded music. There are a host of trade publications, books, websites, video tutorials, etc. all available for free or close to nothing. Read multiple perspectives on how other people use the equipment and start experimenting and finding what works and doesn't.
F) Experiment with open channels. Most of the boards we use at Harvest are digital. As such, the ability to patch sound sources to multiple channels allows the operator to set the mix using preassigned channels, then also double-route inputs to open channels that nobody else but the operator hears. This creates the perfect environment to experiment with real live sound sources with which the tech person can then practice different EQ and compressor settings (or whatever else your heart desires) without the effects being heard by the musicians. As you find some useful settings begin to implement them as long as they don't create a distraction to the hearer.

Much more can be said about this, but enough talk; let's get to work. It's going to take a joint effort on the part of musicians/singers and the techies who serve them to improve in these areas.
Patience, grace, practice, ongoing dialog...Prayer, humility, did I mention patience?

"Do you see a man skillful in his work?
He will stand before kings;
he will not stand before obscure men." Proverbs 22:29

Obama Signs Government Bailout Plan for Failing Smooth Jazz Radio Station...NOT!

Well, I waited a little while to comment on this topic when I could find a moment to gather my thoughts. I've been a little busy with the new family addition. Anyway, here goes...

On the morning of Friday May 22, 2009, cubicles and elevators all around the Chicagoland area paused for 95 1/2 seconds of silence to remember a fallen radio station. OK, not really, but WNUA, the smooth jazz kingpin of the Chicago airwaves officially went off the air due to lagging financial support, replaced by Clear Channel's "Mega" Spanish-pop offering.

This is a big deal for three reasons:
1) On a large scale, it marks a certain facing-of-reality by the music sub-culture that is Smooth Jazz that maybe it really is not a sustainable art form after all. As more of an illegitimate child of '70s fusion-jazz, smooth jazz took off in the mid-1980s as it blended vocals and other pop-crossover stylings offering greater commercial appeal . Further toward the turn of the century, it grafted in slow-jam and funky groove elements, making it a hit among adult "urban" crowds.
2) The replacement format choice is a mega-win for commercial appeal in the region. Chicago has always been a diverse city, but this clearly marks an acknowledgment of the ethnic changes that have been bubbling over for some time. There are other Hispanic stations on the dial, but they play a more traditional south-of-the-border flavor. Mega 95.5 has a significantly more pop-crossover identity, which probably aligns more closely with the blending of Hispanic and American pop-music culture.
3) I can speak openly and frankly about the smooth jazz style as I was immersed in the making of it (which put a good chunk of my food on the table) between 1995 and 2003. For a number of reasons, Chicago became the petri dish for this music, and I just happened to end up working in the recording studio that churned out a great deal of its creative undertakings. I cut my teeth on a whole variety of music - gospel, contemporary Christian, pop, straight-ahead jazz, rock, commercial spots, etc. - but a good chunk of the calendar was filled recording and mixing what I would consider "pop instrumental" music. There where some diamonds in the rough; producers and musicians who brought a high-caliber of musical production values to the table, but those where few and far-between. Most of the time however they were banal, sub-par musical offerings whose ultimate hope was often to get just a hint of airplay on WNUA or its sister stations. "For what ultimate purpose, though?", I often asked. Well, not outloud to the artists, but internally of course. Most of these cats are hardworking musicians, though; many of whom I would still consider friends. As such, if "faithful are the wounds of a friend," then my hope that they would take these words and this new season as a time to get back to the toolshed for some fresh musical offerings.

OK, yes; music is subjective, but here are a few thoughts about music-making and its ability to stay viable over the long haul. First, a song or style's transcendence is directly tied to purity and creativity of the particular expression and its ability to connect with the masses. Write a good song that captures the emotion of the songwriter, which also resonates with the given culture, and deliver it on a fresh and palatable musical canvas, and you'll probably have a classic. Failure on any of these points will likely send you to the music graveyard. Second, Western music has a limited range; 12 notes to be exact. There's only so much one can do to reinvent those notes in a unique way. Now take away the vocal element, which is how the majority of humans connect emotionally with one another through song form, and which is exactly what most smooth jazz songs do, and replace it with an instrument that belongs in the background of pop productions (solos excepted) and make it try to speak like a vocal... Any rational music maker will see that there is no way that this type of creation can have lasting health without offering proper musical nourishment. As the childbirth class instructor for our first baby once said in reference to adequate feedings, "The proof is in the poop!" Finally, music is a gift from God. He gave it to us as an means to creatively express worship, to which He is rightly due. For thousands of years now, people have been singing psalms and hymns and spiritual songs about His infinite worth, wonderful creation, and most of all, His awesome redemption found only through faith in Jesus Christ. Now that's a music style guaranteed to last forever.

Yes, there will still be the fond jokes & memories:
- "Some people take their mix out to the car to listen for reference, but we had a audio tielines from the control room pumped out to the elevator; real world reference, baby!"
- "How do you know when the smooth jazz mix is finished? The engineer is asleep at the board."
- "Steve, turn up the electric guitar already! This isn't smooth jazz, OK!?!"
- A particular friend who had a knack for programming all my car radio presets to 95.5...just because.
- Ah, and who can forget the classic "WNUA theme song" parody tracks by local musician and anti-smooth jazz zealot, Jim Dinou...

Where shall one now turn to hear Sade's "Smooth Operator" or Kenny G's "Songbird"? I guess satellite/internet radio or iTunes or wherever; but for now I count this as a great victory for the artistic purity of the music industry. Kinda' reminds me of the Apostle Peter's condemnation of Ananias and Sapphira in Acts 5, where we see God purifying His church from those intentionally holding back their best from Him.

Dr. Ralph D. Winter

Dr. Ralph Winter, missions pioneer and founder of U.S. Center for World Mission, William Carey International University (and its publishing arm), Frontier Mission Fellowship, and a host of other Kingdom endeavors, went to be with our Lord and Savior on May 20 after a battle with cancer.

Though he clearly impacted countless people for the cause of Christ, I was personally challenged in the Perspectives class which I finished recently, and of which he also was creator and developer.

This passage from an historical survey of three mission eras kept me awake many nights and on my knees: "Doing lots of good things, or as someone has said, 'Keepin' busy for Jesus' individually may be a case of 'good but not good enough.' Our Evangelical perspective has become so individualized that we may only think of individual good works. Doing good little things wherever convenient may sometimes be merely a way to justify and make credible in our own eyes our minimal personal salvation. Starting with our own talents and interests is common but is the way of the world - it is getting things backwards...We must start with His concerns, whatever our gifts, wants, and abilities....Our obligation is to seek the expansion of the knowledge of the glory of God and His Kingdom, and this would logically require us each to prayerfully seek God about doing the hardest thing we are able to do in the most crucial task we can find."

Clearly Dr. Winter did not choose busy himself with good little tasks but instead chose the long and hard road God required of him. What a faithful servant of the Lord Jesus this man was. His legacy is great, yet I know he's standing in the presence of the King hearing the words, "Well done, good and faithful servant." I know Winter's legacy will last globaly as I am sure it will personally. Lord, thank you for this wonderful man. Amen

Flexing the "Children's Lesson" Muscle

It's my regular prayer that our children will grow up knowing and loving Jesus Christ as Savior and Lord. Yes, there are regular talks about Jesus and God, prayers, bible reading, etc., but today brought one extra special moment as I was getting some one-on-one daddy/daughter time with our 3 1/2 year old, Naomi. As a gift to keep her occupied with new baby around, her Auntie Natalie got her a big book of curriculum-based exercises and activities. So we're on page 2 of the letter identification and coloring activity: 4-boxes with different letters, color in the boxes that match the letter (typically 2 of the 4). Lower-case "b" gets colored orange, but Naomi jumped the gun and colored in the box with lower-case "d". Oops, no big deal. But when I pointed it out to her, I could see her spirit was just crushed! She's a bit of a perfectionist, and so with bottom-lip quivering, just began to weep.
As I comforted her and said it'd be OK, I told her we could try to fix it and erase it with a different color. Clever as she is, she asked if we could use the "white" crayon...
Definitely a super-cute moment, but the Holy Spirit nudged me to go a little deeper with her, sharing with her some insight into God's wonderful character.

Isaiah 1:18-20
“Come now, let us reason together, says the Lord:
though your sins are like scarlet,
they shall be as white as snow;
though they are red like crimson,
they shall become like wool."

New Baby & Same Fascinating God.

Dear God, thanks for blessing us with our new family addition, Kathryn Hannah. Not only was the process pretty smooth, but she's beautiful and healthy (despite the usual battle with jaundice) and we're glad to be settling in back home. Thanks for answering many prayers. Give us patience and strength to raise this child to love You her entire life and to do great things for you! Amen.

This is our 3rd child, and each time God shows us some particularly unique things about Himself and how He creates us that drive me to awe and praise. I've seen it before but happened to linger a bit this time thinking about the amazing stuff called vernix caseosa. It's the white, cheesy substance that covers a fetus and has many functions, among which are moisturizer, antimicrobial, antioxidant, and wound-healer. Dear naturalists, at what point did this multifaceted protective coating come into being? Did it have all these properties at once or did those develop over time? Either way, just how did the all mothers universally & magically "will" this stuff into being?
Romans 1:19-20 gives me comfort, assurance, and reminder in the very creative God of Psalm 119:13-16:

"For you formed my inward parts;
you knitted me together in my mother's womb.

I praise you, for I am fearfully and wonderfully made.
Wonderful are your works;
my soul knows it very well.

My frame was not hidden from you,
when I was being made in secret,
intricately woven in the depths of the earth.

Your eyes saw my unformed substance;
in your book were written, every one of them,
the days that were formed for me,
when as yet there was none of them."

Amen and amen!

Message = 1, Technology = 0

We have guest speakers each week for the Perspectives class I've been taking this semester.  Most lectures are interesting and engaging, but a few can leave me sleepy.  I was thrown a curve ball by a recent guest when I walked into the class room and one of these sweet, old overhead projectors was set up in front, ready for action.   The instructor was an old, frail looking man with super-white hair and a tired countenance.  I'd read an article of his earlier in the week for homework and came that night with high expectations. However, after scanning the scene I was like, "Oh, boy... maybe shoulda' stayed home tonight.  Really old instructor + really old technology = wish I would have brought my laptop to catch up on emails during this class..."

However, within a few moments of our guest taking the podium, I knew I had been completely wrong.  Here's an 80+ year old man, a pioneer in cross-cultural Christian missions, sharp as a sword, engaging, witty, relevant.  A few scribblings on the overhead slides, but it didn't slow down the presentation one bit.  Additionally, most of the other lecturers who come in using a more modern projector, hip new laptop, and multimedia presentations have yet to bring to the table an impact equal to this champ.  Once again, it's not about the means; it's all about the message.  Jesus Christ is the most exciting thing about missions, yesterday, today, and forever.  Here's to you David Hesselgrave; thanks for making it so!

Score:  Message = 1, Technology = 0

Context/Text: The Triumphal Provision

Context: I work in the worship ministry at our church, and every Tuesday morning we have a meeting reviewing the services from the previous weekend.  So this past Tuesday, I walk in to the meeting room, and as I'm getting situated, Andi Rozier, our resident worship leader and ministry director asks the rest of the group as they're trickling in if they have their scripture ready to share.  I ask, "Scripture?"  Andi says, "Yeah, I sent out an email last week asking everybody to bring scripture to share with the rest of the group, on the topic of "trusting the Lord."

...Steve opens email archive to check... yep, there it is; how'd I miss that one?

Well, I love the idea of starting the meeting off with mutual encouragement and upbuilding before we dissect our craft.  OK, Lord; I'm trusting you NOW to bring to mind some passage that I've been going through so I can at least share something...

The great thing about reading the Bible is that I can engage it on many levels:  I can search its pages for wisdom on particular issues, pour over it for group study application or personal edification, meditate on it to relate to my creator, etc.  I can count on it to feed the soul.

Anyway, I've been taking a class this semester on World Christian Missions, so much of my deep study time has been used hitting the books.  Additionally, my men's group just wrapped up a study on Colossians.  Squeezing these endeavors around family & work has been challenging, so this season of personal bible study has been of the casual daily-feeding nature; no deep-sea diving going on here.

As such, when Tuesday's meeting rolled around, I felt particularly vulnerable as I didn't think I had anything substantial to share.  The group had begun going around the table sharing, and I'm scrambling to think through what I've read in the past week that would speak to the topic at hand.  "Trusting the Lord?"  Yeah, I could really use to trust the Lord right now to recall something or calm my heart to hold my tongue this time around.

...enter Jehovah Jireh!

I'd been reading through the Gospel of Mark, just keeping up on the ways of Jesus.  What of all I've read could fall under the category of "trusting the Lord"?  Really, that?  No way.  I'm just grasping at straws.  There's no way that passage would apply... Or, OK, maybe.  Let's see.

I can think of countless situations wherein we trust the Lord and seek his provision, favor, wisdom, peace, patience, etc., and the passages that have encouraged me through those times and afterward share and rejoice and pray about how He was faithful.

Yet as I sat listening to the group, stewing over whether I should share or not, it really started to bubble over.  So, here we go.  I'm doing this just to document the thoughts God brought to mind and also maybe to encourage you, too!

Text: Mark 11:1-10.  

For reference, I'm reading out of the English Standard Version.  

The passage is familiar; almost too familiar.  I'd encourage you to slowly read through the passage before proceeding.  It's the Palm Sunday passage where Jesus and the disciples were heading to Jerusalem.  He sends a couple of them into the town ahead to find an unused colt and bring it back to him.  They obediently go and find it just as he said and bring it back.

Now at this point, if I were one of the disciples, I'm thinking "Wow!  What great miracle is Jesus going to perform now?  Or what great insight will he show us using this little pony?  

He's been healing people left and right; a few of us saw his transfiguration; he's been prophesying about his death and resurrection... Stand back friends, what's this gonna' be?"

Or worse, like most times I've read this passage, we breeze through it as just an historical snapshot of a moment in the life of Jesus in the week leading up to his death, replete with memories of Sunday School teachers handing out palm leaves for us to wave around.

And as they enter Jerusalem, Jesus sitting on the colt, we read '"And those who went before and those who followed were shouting, "Hosanna!  Blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord!  Blessed is the coming kingdom of our father David!  Hosanna in the highest!'" (v.9-10 ESV)

Friends, most often when we think of "trusting the Lord" it's throughout a crisis or trial or some spectacular challenge.  How about for once just trusting the Lord in, what appears, the obscure or mundane requests he places in our lives that it's for no other reason than to bring Him pure glory.  This is a worship passage through and through.  "Hey guys, I need you to go run this errand for me.  Why?  Trust me.  It's so that my people can worship me."

Has it been a year?

Oh, yeah; I created this blog about a year ago.  It's my understanding that one is supposed to maintain this outlet with regular updates...  Let's see if I can exercise this a bit more.